danaquarium
 
 Welcome to danaquarium Friday, September 10 2010 @ 11:40 AM PDT 
advanced search   Contact    RSS    What is danaquarium?
 Main 
Home
Gallery
Links
Polls
Site Stats
Public Calendar
What is danaquarium?
(hosting provided by MacDave)
Topics
General News
Locations of visitors to this page

 User Functions 
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

 Advertisements 

 What's New 
STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

LINKS last 2 wks
No recent new links



 Open Source browsers damage businesses.   
Wednesday, February 09 2005 @ 05:57 AM PST

Views: 18936

General NewsOpen Source web browsers are causing untold damage to businesses around the globe, according to Microsoft security specialist David Keppelmeyer.

Keppelmeyer believes the sudden rise in popularity of browsers such as Firefox competing for Internet Explorer's market share is not only an attack upon Microsoft, but is directly "squeezing more attacks upon IE users."

"What we're seeing is a shifting of percentages across the board" says Keppelmeyer. As he explains it, it's a numbers game. As the number of open source browsers such as Firefox rise, then there are relatively fewer Internet Explorer users left to bear the brunt of the existing malware such as spyware, viruses and worms.

"You have to ask yourself 'what are the motives here?' Why would you switch to a platform that doesn't provide you with rich media content such as ActiveX and Windows Media Player?".

Keppelmeyer claims that the authors of malicious software use open source browsers to protect themselves from their creations. While Keppelmeyer says "not all open source users are necessarily creating malicious software", all who adopt it for regular use are changing the arena in which attacks are carried out.

"The end result is more attacks directly on Microsoft Internet Explorer users. Since open source browsers can't compete with Internet Explorer in the realm of features, they are attempting to undergrow our market share, making each IE user more likely to be attacked by the greater relative numbers of viruses, worms and malicious trojans".

"That's an underhanded, abhorrent tactic."

"If you are a business that uses Internet Explorer and other businesses are using Firefox, when the next worm hits it's you that suffers. That's directly the fault of Firefox adopters. In effect other businesses who have switched have squeezed more attacks your way".






Open Source browsers damage businesses. | 23 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Open Source browsers damage businesses.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 05:44 AM PST
Hilarious!

If this is a joke, it's quite funny.
If it's a serious article, it's fun to laugh at the faulty logic MS is trying to push.
[ Reply to This ]
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 06:09 AM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 06:32 AM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 03 2005 @ 05:17 AM PDT
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 08:36 AM PST
    The rising popularity of non-IE browsers also hurts anti-virus and anti-spyware developers who are facing a declining market. This is a significant economic threat that needs to be addressed.
    [ Reply to This ]
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 03:18 PM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 11 2005 @ 11:58 AM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 09:06 AM PST
    The TCO of an open source browser will always be more, in real terms than Internet explorer, even though it may cost less in the long run to deploy. This is due to the increased market leverage that allows greater multimedia presence amoung corporate and home users, despite appearing the same to the user.

    While the fans of 'free' or 'open source' software may claim better security and stability for browsers such as firefox, extended internet penetration and rich content are enhancements of the internet experience, and must be designed into the product, rather than added on later.

    Obviously, this can only lead to a damaging effect to the on line ecosystem of interconnected content management.
    [ Reply to This ]
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 11:32 AM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 01:23 PM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 04:01 PM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 11:47 AM PST
  • Open Source browsers DEFINITELY have higher 'TCO' - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 12:32 PM PST
  • I assume this is satire also - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 11:50 PM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 01:37 PM PST
    Hey, it may be a joke THIS TIME, but recently some idiot was saying the biggest problem with OSS browsers was that they didn't run Active X! The biggest security hole on the planet!

    I fully expect to see this same logic in the article coming out of some Microsoft moron's mouth any day now...

    Maybe right out of Bill's mouth directly since he seems to be babbling about "security being a priority" these days...and that's a huge joke...

    [ Reply to This ]
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 05:52 PM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 11 2005 @ 03:39 AM PST
  • Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 10 2005 @ 10:30 PM PST
    Mr. Keppelmeyer,
    can you ask you a question:
    "How many Internet Explorers does it take to change a lightbulb on UNIX?"
    ;)
    [ Reply to This ]
    Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 11 2005 @ 05:47 AM PST
    Please, this was told to be satire, so why bother, unless with better satire.
    [ Reply to This ]
    It's not a security vulnerability...
    Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 11 2005 @ 05:54 AM PST
    ...it's a feature!
    [ Reply to This ]
    Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 11 2005 @ 10:35 PM PST
    It's unbelievable.
    Is anybody on planet earth who can think it seriously?

    May I ask one of the users who complained about the TCO of the OSS
    softwares that what the TCO of an explorer is? Even if it is OSS?
    (Since the IE is boundled with the OS the TCO cannot be separated.)
    I assume that he hasn't ever payed money for M$ products.
    Or if so, he is not from the developing countries where the product cost
    (I mean the OS price) is in the same magnitude as of the living standard.
    Do you think it is fair?

    This is one of the reasons why I thinkg the software market
    work the way it really should.
    Hence I choose to use and support OSS
    everywhere it is possible even if it has less fabulous features.
    (such as blue death:)
    But in the given case, I choose Firefox for functionality, too.
    Reliable, fast, less bugous, less virus prone and that far much more than
    enough reason to choose.
    [ Reply to This ]
    Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 06 2005 @ 07:11 AM PDT
    I'm using Linux. I'm using Firefox. Will Microsoft be angry at me for choosing superior products that are free, too?

    If these statements are really from M$, well... they won't last long this way...
    [ Reply to This ]
    Open Source browsers damage businesses.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 23 2006 @ 12:52 PM PST
    Wow, that is just about the wrongest, most idiotic thing I've ever read.

    Wasn't the increased market share of Windows and IE supposed to be the explanation for the proliferation of viruses, trojans, and mal-ware for Windows and IE? Then, doesn't it stand to reason that reduced market share would make the products more secure?

    Or is the total damage done by mal-ware against Microsoft products some sort of universal constant? Thus, a smaller market for Internet Explorer means greater damage done to each user, maintaining that constant. Makes about as much sense as Catholicism.

    If I live in a city with a low crime rate, am I somehow responsible for the higher crime rates in other cities? If I'm a good driver, can you blame your high accident rates on me?

    Here's the kiss of death though: "Since open source browsers can't compete with Internet Explorer in the realm of features..."

    What the hell? Which browser has only recently caught up to the rest in terms of security, tabbed browsing, and RSS news reading? Feature-for-feature I'd put Firefox and Safari way ahead of IE 7.
    [ Reply to This ]
     What's Related 
  • More from General News


  •  Copyright © 2010 danaquarium
     All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Powered By GeekLog 
    Created this page in 0.06 seconds